United Business Media EE Times




Search


HOMELATEST NEWSSEMICONDUCTORSMOST POPULARMARKET INTELLIGENCE UNITFORUMSDESIGNNEW PRODUCTSCAREERSBLOGSCONTACTEVENTSSIGN UP!RSS

 

Closer Look: Intel changes its mind on DDR400








EBN


Intel Corp. apparently has reversed itself on memory once again and next year will introduce a chipset supporting DDR400. Not unexpectedly, once Intel embraced DDR400 in the DDR-I format, the JEDEC Information Technology Association changed its tune also and is suddenly gearing up to adopt a standard on the new memory chip. In short order, DDR400 has gone from the stepchild of the chip industry to potentially becoming a main player. Intel, of course, isn't talking beyond the normal rejoinder: "we don't comment on unannounced products." And JEDEC officials hide behind the confidentiality of standards deliberation meetings.

But the DDR400 cat is out of the bag. Intel, which doesn't introduce a new chipset without copious validation and qualification, is already contacting memory chip and module makers for DDR400 samples for testing. And sources inside JEDEC said discussion of a new DDR400 standard will come up at the panel's next quarterly meeting in Hawaii on December 4.

You will remember that only a few months ago Intel was bad-mouthing DDR400. Not needed because the next lowest DDR333 speed grade was quite adequate. No DDR400 JEDEC standard. Potential heat dissipation and signal integrity problems. And Intel didn't want to divert resources for the comprehensive DDR400 validation testing.

So what caused the surprising about-face?

Intel reportedly decided to next year upgrade to a quad-pumped 800-MHz processor front side bus. And suddenly a DDR400 memory at 400Mbits/sec data rate was a multiple frequency match with the 800-MHz FSB.

Also chipmakers were getting higher and higher yields of DDR400. With die shrinks to 130-nanometer (0.13-micron) processing, the higher memory speeds were much easier to achieve. And since the high speed PC main memory and server chip is a bin-out sort from final testing, the 400Mbit/sec version was a natural by-product.

Samsung officials claimed that at least one-third of its DDR production is coming in at DDR400 frequency. In fact, Samsung is having to down-sort naturally fabricated 400Mbits/sec chips to lower speed grade DDR333 and DDR266 versions because of the current lower sales volumes of DDR400.

So far DDR400 has been relegated to a niche market of white box PC builders looking to differentiate their boxes from mainstream competitors. Two third-party chipset vendors, Silicon Integrated Systems and Nvidia Corp., can support DDR400 for AMD processors, and SiS and Via Technology Inc. support Intel MPUs as well.

All that should change markedly when Intel comes out with its own DDR400 chipset next year.

This column has learned, however, that contrary to some industry reports, Intel's next generation Springdale chipset slated to debut in Q3 '03, won't be the version supporting DDR400.

The latest Intel memory roadmap quick-change is reminiscent of past switches from Rambus RDRAM and late adoption of DDR. With the DDR400 flip-flop, however, Intel appears to be leading the charge this time instead of belatedly following the trend.











  Free Subscription to EE Times
First Name Last Name
Company Name Title
Email address
  Click here for your Free Subscription to EETimes Europe
 
CAREER CENTER
Ready to take that job and shove it?
SEARCH JOBS
SPONSOR

RECENT JOB POSTINGS
CAREER NEWS
10 Search Engines You Don't Know About
Go beyond Google and get vertical. These specialized search sites will help you find the business information you need -- fast.

For more great jobs, career related news, features and services, please visit EETimes' Career Center.



All White Papers »   

  Around Silicon Strategies

How Samsung beat Japan Inc.: How Samsung made the transition from a consumer electronics dwarf to a global brand is a well-told story. Less well-known is the story of how Samsung achieved its current supremacy. More...

Is China into chips?: A few years and billions of dollars after Chinese companies stormed into the silicon foundry market, at least one analyst wonders if being a top player in the global chip business is still a Chinese priority. More...

Albany NanoTech goes clean: Seeking to replicate its success in semiconductors, R&D specialist Albany NanoTech and its parent organization are bringing its collaboration model over to clean technology. Will it work? More...

10 fab technologies on the hot seat: Our report lists 10 fab technologies that could make or break future IC scaling. These fab technologies are on the ''hot seat.'' Some are doomed to fail, while others are under pressure. More...

35 people, places & things: We are witnessing the integration of technology with society to an unprecedented degree. In this special report, we offer a glimpse of the next 35 years--what's coming down the pike, and how we might begin to make sense of it. More...

Top 10 predictions for semis in 2008: To help sort out chip market confusion, EE Times semiconductor editor Mark LaPedus offers his own chip forecasts--and other predictions--for 2008. So, what will happen to AMD, Freescale, IBM Micro, SMIC and others? More...

Market intelligence: Ethernet is poised to dominate all aspects of networking, but the new speeds will have effects that ripple out in various ways. That's the conclusion of one of several analysis reports available from EE Times Market Intelligence Unit. More...

Silicon 60 version 7.0 The EE Times 60 Emerging Startups list, first published in April 2004, has been updated to version 7.0 to reflect the latest corporate, commercial, technology and market conditions. More...

 

FEATURED TOPIC



ADDITIONAL TOPICS












Home | About | Editorial Calendar | Feedback | Subscriptions | Newsletter | Media Kit | Contact | Reprints|  RSS|   Digital|  Mobile
Network Websites
International
Network Features




All materials on this site Copyright © 2008 TechInsights, a Division of United Business Media LLC All rights reserved.
Privacy Statement | Your California Privacy Rights | Terms of Service | About